- · 《数学教育学报》栏目设[09/30]
- · 《数学教育学报》数据库[09/30]
- · 《数学教育学报》投稿方[09/30]
- · 《数学教育学报》征稿要[09/30]
- · 《数学教育学报》刊物宗[09/30]
通过对比进行学习多重样例变异性与先前知识的(12)
作者:网站采编关键词:
摘要:In this study, problem type and solution method were identified as two critical aspects for learning how to solve linear equations, and four comparison conditions were designed accordingly. 251 sevent
In this study, problem type and solution method were identified as two critical aspects for learning how to solve linear equations, and four comparison conditions were designed accordingly. 251 seventh-grade students were randomly assigned to learn equation solving by (1) first comparing separate variation of problem types and solution methods and then comparing simultaneous variation of these two aspects, abbreviated as Type_Method_Type+Method, (2) first comparing separate variation of solution methods and then comparing simultaneous variation of problem types and solution methods, abbreviated as Method_Method_Type+Method,(3) first comparing separate variation of problem types and then comparing simultaneous variation of problem types and solution methods, abbreviated as Type_Type_Type+Method, or (4) comparing separation variation of problem types and solution methods but not comparing simultaneous variation of these two aspects, abbreviated as Type_Method_Type/Method. Students’ procedural knowledge, flexibility knowledge, and conceptual knowledge were assessed at pretest and posttest to evaluate the effectiveness of different comparisons.
To examine the possible interaction effect between students’ prior knowledge and experimental condition,students were categorized as using shortcuts or not using shortcuts based on their pretest performance. Results showed significant interaction effects between prior knowledge and condition. Comparing the two critical aspects of problem type and solution method first separately and then simultaneously (Type_Method_Type+Method) led to more flexibility knowledge and conceptual knowledge than other methods for students who did not use shortcuts at pretest. The effectiveness of this method, however, was reverse for students who used shortcuts at pretest. In addition, Type_Method_Type/Method was the least beneficial condition for students who did not use shortcuts at pretest; Method_Method_Type+Method was the most beneficial condition for students who used shortcuts at pretest.
文章来源:《数学教育学报》 网址: http://www.sxjyxbzz.cn/qikandaodu/2021/0518/893.html
上一篇:助力学生爱上英语的措施分析
下一篇:核心素养视角下初高中数学教学衔接的实施策略